Skip to main content

So Rich yet So Poor



Singapore as a country is very rich so do residents staying in Singapore, regardless of their nationality.  This is how Gross Domestic Products are measured and with population of 5 million over, our economy is now richer than our closer competitor, Hong Kong which has more than 7 million people.

Look at the following headline, how wonderful it is:

 

Singapore's GDP set to overtake Hong Kong's this year: Merrill Lynch


Our land is smaller, our population is smaller and yet we are richer.  This in the past, especially before GE2011, is what the People’s Action Party (PAP) is championing for.  We have made it. We have achieved it and have beaten Hong Kong handsomely.  So, shall call for a celebration?  Yes, in the past, before 7 May 2011, the PAP will show off and the media will highlight it as another greater achievement for the government.

As what Dr. Lim Wee Kiak’s thinking and joking about our ministerial pay, Singaporeans can now travel around the world and asking other people how much is their GDP and looking down almost all of them, including Hong Kong people, most Europeans because their per capita GDP is much smaller than us.     

But, wait a moment… There is another side of the story and this are the real reasons why the PAP did badly in GE2011.

We are really not that rich, especially for the lower bottom of the residents.  Excluding foreigner labour (maids and workers), these poor residents are true blue Singapore citizens.  They can’t even own a home or dying at home without notice.

Here are 2 pieces of the sad news:

Khaw: Tens of thousands of rental flats needed


and

 

About 6 elderly S'poreans die alone each month



Are we heading even more of the good and bad news? Are we moving towards even a greater social divide, for those have and haven’t?   No wonder our Gini index is getting into a dangerous level.  We will experience and expect to see more rich getting richer and more poor become poorer.

The government is listening as what PM Lee told Singaporeans when he begins his new term as Primer Minister.  PM Lee is asking for a review on the ministerial pay.   What can expect? Can a lower paying Minister solve the housing problem and care more for the poor, sick and old?      

It is too early to tell.  Let’s wait and see. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...