Skip to main content

NMP And The Most Important Book: Who Is To Decide? May History Make The Decision?

How can we define whether a person or a book is important, most important or not important at all? Should it be defined according to public opinions, the applicants, the author, or history?  We don’t know.  It is especially difficult to assess the importance of a book when the author is alive. Just like many art pieces, their intrinsic value will only surface (unfortunately) after the passing of the painters.

Lin Yutang wrote an interesting book about Su Tungpo – ‘The Gay Genius – The life and Time of Su Tungpo’. Su’s works were banned and the Song government even imposed fine for possessing the poems, prose and paintings by Su.  However, century later, the government had to withdraw the order and praised Su again with highest respect.  

History is very funny. It records the past for future readings and assessments.  The current happenings may not be the true pictures of the events.  Hopefully candidates who apply for the Nominated Members of Parliament know what they are doing and applying for. And also, those who have said they have written the most important books in their life may have to take notice that this is only their own assessments.  What the future generations think and evaluate may be very different from the current reality.  

Just like Lin said in his book:

<There is a current Chinese saying that final judgment upon a man is possible only when the cover is nailed on his coffin.  (盖棺定论)    
A man’s life is like a drama, and we can judge a drama only when the curtain drops.>  

In explaining the difficulty of assessing a living man, Lin has this to say:

<It is really not so difficult to know a man dead a thousand year ago.  Considering how incomplete our knowledge usually is of people who live in the same city, of even the private life of the mayor, it seems sometimes easier to know a dead man than a living one.  For one thing, the living man’s life is not completed, and one never knows what he is going to do next when a crisis comes.  …… That is why it is so difficult usually to judge a contemporary, whose life is too close to us.>

On blacklist and treatments of Su Tungpo, Lin further described:

<One year after the death of Su Tungpo …, a historically important episode occurred.  This was the establishment of the famous Yuanyu Partisans’ tablet, a symbol and a summing up of the struggles of the whole period. …..  the tablet was a black-list of 309 men, headed by Su Tungpo, of the Yuanyu regime. It banned for ever by imperial order these persons and their children from assuming office in the government. …….. For over a century, the children of the black-listed men boasted that their ancestors’ names were included in the tablet. > 

Yuanyu Tablet Source: 

However, Lin stressed the importance of integrity in writings:

<Su Tungpo’s peculiar position in China’s history was, therefore, based on his courageous stand for his principles and opinions, as well as upon the charm of his poems and prose.  His character and principles constitute the ‘bones’ of his fame, while the charm of style and language forms the ‘flesh and skin’ that embody the beauty of his spirit.  I do not think that we can, at heart, admire a writer lacking in integrity, however brilliant and charming his writings may be. >

Tablet, History and NMP

In 1990, the NMP scheme was introduced when there was an overwhelming majority of PAP MPs in Parliament.

A Nominated Member of Parliament(NMP) is a Member of the Parliament of Singapore who is appointed instead of being elected into office by the people, and who does not belong to any political party or represent any constituency. There are currently nine NMPs in Parliament. The introduction of NMPs in September 1990, effected to bring more independent voices into Parliament, was an important modification of the traditional Westminster parliamentary system that Singapore had. (Source: wikipedia)

Applicants who are aiming for NMP posts have to learn a lesson from the Yuanyu Tablet.  The have to always remind themselves that they are appointed, to be independent and their present is an important modification of the parliament system.

Furthermore, the political situation now is very different from 1990.  The past performance of majority of NMPs and whether the NMP scheme is appropriate at the first place are all still in doubt in the historical perspective. It really takes some courage and motivations to stand before the Select Committee. 


Popular posts from this blog






行动党和李显龙总理,就是看准了,看透了新加坡人的心理,表明这是司法程序,在法庭、在法律上,行动党政府都不会被打败。那些敢于挑战法律的人,在新加坡的短短50多年的建国历史中,下场都是以悲剧结束。最近的一个例子, 就是新加坡最年轻的政治犯余澎杉在美国的遭遇。同样一个人,不同的国情,命运也不一样。
今年的总统选举,基本上已经是没戏看了。大家大约都可以估算到结局。反而是三、四年后的大选,存在变数。 行动党也了解,要重获2015大选的佳绩,在没有造神运动的条件下,似乎是不可能。因此,要维持一个高得票率,就必须出一些怪招。把非选区议员人数增加到12位,就是给人民一个小甜头。如果真的上当,新加坡就清一色没有非行动党的市镇理事会了。

李显龙的幻象:新加坡人对他的 dishonorable 行为无动于衷。

李显龙当然有焦虑,正如他的妹妹和弟弟对他的指责:Dishonorable son。李显龙害怕人们对他的诚信起疑心,因此,在国会搞了一个自辩。既然国会没有提出相关资料证明他的诚信有问题,那李显龙就是清白了。
李显龙的确有焦虑,但是,他却认为新加坡人很乖,很听话: 给你们什么总统候选人,你们就会认命接受; 想提告什么人,就提告,法律面前人人平等,没有人有意见; 给什么议长人选,国会就认命接受; 地铁误点误事,任何解释,人民都会接受; 无现金就是无限金,跟不上是你的错; 糖尿病就少吃白饭,多吃糙米饭;。。。。
这是一种李显龙独特的焦虑幻象。他很焦虑,自己无法做得比老爸好,甚至连吴作栋都不如。他也焦虑在后工业时代,新加坡无法创造高薪职位给年轻人;新加坡无法照顾贫穷老弱,无法为他们提供医药服务; 接班人无法胜任挑战; 新加坡人在无限金时代,成了乡下佬; 地铁和教育服务提不上来; 。。。
陈川仁自愿减薪出任国会议长,不论是升职还是降职,已经充分说明,他在国会外,在行动党的职业保护伞外,无法找到一份比国会议长,还要高薪水的工作。 这点显示他不如海军出身的吕德耀。吕德耀即使找不到高薪职位,也毅然离开内阁和国会。 陈川仁,为李显龙成川成仁,却也凸显接班人的素质问题和骨气问题。他们离开了行动党的大树,如何面对现实生活?李显龙能…