Skip to main content

PAP in Business: End of Singapore Model

Has Singapore reached its limit in social, environment and economic sustainability? PAP in Business is certainly not a sustainable development model for Singapore. In 2012, things are not progressing smoothly as before in the little red dot and our sustainable growth is in question.

A fully owned PAP company, entering business with no experience, no capital, no manpower and no office, has emerged as a new business sustainable model in Singapore?

By now everyone is familiar with Aim, the $2 company taking over the software from 14 PAP town councils and leases it back to the same town councils for rentals.  It is a normal business practice – sell and leaseback. Provided you sell at a profit and lease back at a lower rental.  Maybe PAP town councils don’t see in this direction, just like they invested money in Leman Brothers’ high risk financial products.  So, they can afford to lose money again - investing in software development and writing the investment off later.

This new business model has just been confirmed by Dr Teo Ho Pin, the coordinating chairman for 14 PAP town councils.  He also confirmed that the fully PAP owned Aim was the only bidder for sale and leaseback tender exercise.

If this is successful and is able to avoid conflict of interest, will more PAP-related businesses enter the commercial world in Singapore?  If yes, this will be the new engine of growth for Singapore economy.  If a $2 company can generate multiple times of return, then more people can afford to buy luxury homes and expensive cars. House prices and COEs for cars can be kept at a sustainable higher level without fear of losing demand.

The next step, perhaps, is to structure the new business model into a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) and gets it listed at SGX. A trust fund with constant rental income with good paymasters like town councils is able to attract investors at SGX. We must congratulate the PAP for being so enterprise and is able to generate high return for investors.  This new model can replace those half-surviving SMEs who can’t afford to pay high salary, high rental and high operating expenses.

However, sad to say, this is the limit for sustainable development.  The PAP has reached its peak.  Using a PAP-owned company to run a public good shows that the PAP has no more business ideas.

Things are not as smooth as before

Limit to growth or the economic led development is certainly not sustainable anymore in Singapore.  If we look at the sustainable development triangle, we will find that Singapore currently is at the stage of inequitable, unbearable and unviable development.  Our growth is unsustainable and we need to change the model urgently. Of course, the PAP will not admit it as they still want to dream of a solution through the national conversation.

Here are some examples of sustainable problems in Singapore:
Inequitable development between social and economic, e.g. rich and poor gap.

Unbearable living space between social and environment (infrastructure), e.g. the public transport system.

Unviable policy between economic and environment (population), e.g. immigration and foreign workers.  
These unsustainable developments result to the following social, environment and economic problems. 

Moral problems: underage sex, sex with students, sex for contracts, sex involving members of parliament donate little, low birth rate, homeless people, etc. 

Emotionless, unhappy, housing and transport problems, even language and culture problems etc.

Rich and poor gap, workers on strike, high rental, uncertain external demand, questionable returns of CPF, GIC and Temasek, etc

What is sustainable development? 
"Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs". It contains two key concepts:·        the concept of "needs", in particular the essential needs of the world's poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and
·        the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs."

There are also suggestions to add a fourth sustainable dimension: culture. Again, Singapore will not score high in cultural aspect and has no cultural sustainability either.

We have sustainability problems and 2012 has indicated them in a big way.  What can we do? Can we depend on the PAP in Business as a new development model?


Popular posts from this blog






行动党和李显龙总理,就是看准了,看透了新加坡人的心理,表明这是司法程序,在法庭、在法律上,行动党政府都不会被打败。那些敢于挑战法律的人,在新加坡的短短50多年的建国历史中,下场都是以悲剧结束。最近的一个例子, 就是新加坡最年轻的政治犯余澎杉在美国的遭遇。同样一个人,不同的国情,命运也不一样。
今年的总统选举,基本上已经是没戏看了。大家大约都可以估算到结局。反而是三、四年后的大选,存在变数。 行动党也了解,要重获2015大选的佳绩,在没有造神运动的条件下,似乎是不可能。因此,要维持一个高得票率,就必须出一些怪招。把非选区议员人数增加到12位,就是给人民一个小甜头。如果真的上当,新加坡就清一色没有非行动党的市镇理事会了。

李显龙的幻象:新加坡人对他的 dishonorable 行为无动于衷。

李显龙当然有焦虑,正如他的妹妹和弟弟对他的指责:Dishonorable son。李显龙害怕人们对他的诚信起疑心,因此,在国会搞了一个自辩。既然国会没有提出相关资料证明他的诚信有问题,那李显龙就是清白了。
李显龙的确有焦虑,但是,他却认为新加坡人很乖,很听话: 给你们什么总统候选人,你们就会认命接受; 想提告什么人,就提告,法律面前人人平等,没有人有意见; 给什么议长人选,国会就认命接受; 地铁误点误事,任何解释,人民都会接受; 无现金就是无限金,跟不上是你的错; 糖尿病就少吃白饭,多吃糙米饭;。。。。
这是一种李显龙独特的焦虑幻象。他很焦虑,自己无法做得比老爸好,甚至连吴作栋都不如。他也焦虑在后工业时代,新加坡无法创造高薪职位给年轻人;新加坡无法照顾贫穷老弱,无法为他们提供医药服务; 接班人无法胜任挑战; 新加坡人在无限金时代,成了乡下佬; 地铁和教育服务提不上来; 。。。
陈川仁自愿减薪出任国会议长,不论是升职还是降职,已经充分说明,他在国会外,在行动党的职业保护伞外,无法找到一份比国会议长,还要高薪水的工作。 这点显示他不如海军出身的吕德耀。吕德耀即使找不到高薪职位,也毅然离开内阁和国会。 陈川仁,为李显龙成川成仁,却也凸显接班人的素质问题和骨气问题。他们离开了行动党的大树,如何面对现实生活?李显龙能…