Skip to main content

2013 Year of Re-think, from Riot to Rentier Economy

Inside or outside Singapore, even it is an isolated case as claimed by the government, the Little India riot is a piece of international news.   It presented the other side of Singapore to the international audiences, that a stable country can also have violence.

So, we need to rethink the possible reasons for the Riot, beyond the official version.  Besides riot, the whole of 2013 is a year of re-thinking, re-consideration, re-assessment and re-evaluation of our past, present and future. The PAP is re-thinking and re-introducing democratic socialist.  Why?  It is because our very successful model is mainly based on the rentier economy and rentier capitalism.  So, the PAP is re-examining its glory past and tries to re-fine the model.  Will it work?  It is too early to tell.

Rentier economy

Rentier economy usually refers to oil rich producing countries but it can also refer to countries that have certain characteristics of a rentier state.

There are four characteristics that would determine whether or not a state could be identified as rentier#1: 
1. if rent situations predominate
2. if the economy relies on a substantial external rent – and therefore does not require a strong domestic productive sector
3. if only a small proportion of the working population is actually involved in the generation of the rent
4. and, perhaps most importantly, which the state’s government is the principal recipient of the external rent.[2]

How well does Singapore fit into the above characteristics?

1.   Yes. For example our location, our big government business, our special designed election system, etc.
2.   Yes. For example, our trade is many times our GDP, the tourists arrival is more than the local population, etc.
3.   Yes. For example, the emphasis on scholars and foreign talents and now even the casinos are only open for foreigners etc.
4.   Yes. For example, the CPF monies, official reserves, GIC and Temasek Holdings etc.  

Rental incomes

If we have the characteristics of a rentier economy, then where are the rental incomes?

These rental incomes can come from COE and ERP; work permits; casino licences; Singapore Pool; sale of state lands; the difference between CPF interest rate and investment returns of GIC/Temasek;  in elections through media control and boundary design; etc.

Singapore has no natural resources, but using administration measures, the PAP government can achieve the level of rentier economy for its own consumption.   

Besides the state having renting income, in a personal capacity, individuals can also enjoy profit above normal level.  One very clear example is the highly paid ministers.  Administration decision can be taken without public consultation to award ministers salaries above international standard. 

One of the reasons that rich becomes richer in Singapore is due to rentier economy. For example you can see them in property investment, in personal tax rates, or not to forget there is no capital gain (e.g. shares) and real estate duty.  

The unique rentier structure in Singapore can also benefit some individuals who dare to take risk.  For example, false marriage, false IC or lending of IC, illegal application of HDB flats, illegal subletting, etc.

With the rentier income in national and individual level, we now recall 10 events in 2013 that are related to this.  You can see from these events that how the PAP re-thinks and re-evaluate its position in a rentier economy.

The Top 10 Re-thinks in 2013

The ten 2013 things for thought for Singapore are as follows:

1 Punggol by-election: Why did voters reject the PAP? Are they happy with the current distribution under our rentier state?

2 Population: Why did the first ever large scale legalized peaceful protect in Singapore taking place in Hong Lim Park? Are they happy with the population distribution under rentier economic model?

3 Social media: Is ‘Free My Internet’ movement necessary? How do things change in the new media era? Can a rentier state continue to control the media?

4 Housing: Is getting a HDB flat first before marriage a new trend? Will the new housing policy make a fairer distribution of state estates?

5 Democratic socialism: Is this a re-think of the PAP? Is this a clear signal to move away from the rentier practices?

6 llo llo: How important are maids in Singapore society and the problems of children growing up under this environment? Like Little India Riot, is there an urgent need to re-think the foreign workers policy in the new democratic socialist arrangement?

7 MedicalShield: This medical insurance is now compulsory for all Singaporeans. You can’t even opt out. Is this the result of our rentier economy after a review of the past mistakes?

8 Legal and court: There are some challenges (Hougang by-election, gay right, death penalty etc.) to the interpretation of our constitution. This, perhaps, is the most important of all the events.   How does the court maintain its position in a rentier state?  

9 AIM and town council management: Will the story continue to the next election? How do public view the government using its rentier power to score points or lose points?

10 Prime Minister: Do we need to re-think his performance during the year? Is his high salary, due to the rentier capitalism, matching his performance over the years?


For further reading:
Britain is recreating a rentier society fit for a baby royal


Popular posts from this blog






行动党和李显龙总理,就是看准了,看透了新加坡人的心理,表明这是司法程序,在法庭、在法律上,行动党政府都不会被打败。那些敢于挑战法律的人,在新加坡的短短50多年的建国历史中,下场都是以悲剧结束。最近的一个例子, 就是新加坡最年轻的政治犯余澎杉在美国的遭遇。同样一个人,不同的国情,命运也不一样。
今年的总统选举,基本上已经是没戏看了。大家大约都可以估算到结局。反而是三、四年后的大选,存在变数。 行动党也了解,要重获2015大选的佳绩,在没有造神运动的条件下,似乎是不可能。因此,要维持一个高得票率,就必须出一些怪招。把非选区议员人数增加到12位,就是给人民一个小甜头。如果真的上当,新加坡就清一色没有非行动党的市镇理事会了。

李显龙的幻象:新加坡人对他的 dishonorable 行为无动于衷。

李显龙当然有焦虑,正如他的妹妹和弟弟对他的指责:Dishonorable son。李显龙害怕人们对他的诚信起疑心,因此,在国会搞了一个自辩。既然国会没有提出相关资料证明他的诚信有问题,那李显龙就是清白了。
李显龙的确有焦虑,但是,他却认为新加坡人很乖,很听话: 给你们什么总统候选人,你们就会认命接受; 想提告什么人,就提告,法律面前人人平等,没有人有意见; 给什么议长人选,国会就认命接受; 地铁误点误事,任何解释,人民都会接受; 无现金就是无限金,跟不上是你的错; 糖尿病就少吃白饭,多吃糙米饭;。。。。
这是一种李显龙独特的焦虑幻象。他很焦虑,自己无法做得比老爸好,甚至连吴作栋都不如。他也焦虑在后工业时代,新加坡无法创造高薪职位给年轻人;新加坡无法照顾贫穷老弱,无法为他们提供医药服务; 接班人无法胜任挑战; 新加坡人在无限金时代,成了乡下佬; 地铁和教育服务提不上来; 。。。
陈川仁自愿减薪出任国会议长,不论是升职还是降职,已经充分说明,他在国会外,在行动党的职业保护伞外,无法找到一份比国会议长,还要高薪水的工作。 这点显示他不如海军出身的吕德耀。吕德耀即使找不到高薪职位,也毅然离开内阁和国会。 陈川仁,为李显龙成川成仁,却也凸显接班人的素质问题和骨气问题。他们离开了行动党的大树,如何面对现实生活?李显龙能…